You are viewing wine

 

Wine Discussion - The Judgement of Vegas: Blind Tasting & Bottleshock pt2

About The Judgement of Vegas: Blind Tasting & Bottleshock pt2

Previous Entry The Judgement of Vegas: Blind Tasting & Bottleshock pt2 Apr. 14th, 2013 @ 10:28 pm
We all agreed that the wines were equally well made and that it was a case a of personal preference as to which one you liked more. Our verdicts (there were 6 of us, split down the middle.) Even the most experienced "wineaux" in the room didn't guess the regions correctly.

Pix below the cut:



Francis Ford Coppela Claret (2010) vs. Chateau La Tonnelle Haut-Medoc, 2009
Reds (Bordeaux) photo JudgementRed_zpsa6fe6814.jpg

The Claret drinks easier out of the bottle, but once the Haut-Medoc opens, up, it becomes a deliciously spicy wine with smoky notes that made me think of Lapsang Souchong. I happened to like the Claret's fruityness more (and it is not a fruit bomb), but I will say that the Haut-Medoc, once given 30 minutes of breathing is delicious, too. But before it breathes, it is bitter.

My friend who likes sweet wines actually liked the Haut-Medoc more after it opened up because she liked the way it felt in her mouth more. (It's a skoosh heavier than the Claret.)

Domaine De La Garenne Macon-Aze 2009 (White Burgundy) vs. Raymond Reserve Napa Chardonnay 2009
 photo JudgementWhite_zps54c11eaa.jpg

The Macon-Aze is unoaked, the Napa is oaked for 2 months. The Macon-Aze had a fruity nose with lots of green apple and lemon grass notes both in the nose and in the mouth. The Napa had a floral nose, a bit like Jasmine blossoms and was less zingy and minerally and it had a kiss of vanilla in the aftertaste. (It wasn't by any means buttery.)

Both of these wines went well with the Pasta in Alfredo sauce. I liked them both equally and it would depend on what style of Chard I was in the mood for -- unoaked or (lightly) oaked.

Domaine Paulilles Banyuls Rimage 2009 vs. Sobon Estate 2011 Zinfandel Port


This is the wine that everybody had to taste several times before they could decide which one they liked more. Neither of them is "hot", despite being fortified. Both of them pair beautifully with chocolate. Both had lovely spicy noses. The Zinfandel port is a kiss sweeter (but not a mouth of sugar) and a bit more fruity and grapey (but not foxy), while the Banyuls has some lovely creme-brulle notes mixed into the spicy tastes.



Lessons learned --

I served asparagus with dinner and had a bit of fun watching the less experienced among us learn not to wash it down with red wine. ;)

Also, I should've put out a bottle of Mouton Cadet and a 2 Buck Chuck Chard so that my guests would have a better idea of contrasts in quality -- they would've tasted a wine that is clearly not equal in quality.
Current Mood: amusedamused
Leave a comment
[User Picture Icon]
From:msminlr
Date:April 15th, 2013 11:43 am (UTC)
(Link)
Nothing to do with the wine, but I think you left off the "img src" part of the HTML link for that last photo.
[User Picture Icon]
From:kadymae
Date:April 15th, 2013 03:19 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Thanks!
[User Picture Icon]
From:phetch
Date:April 15th, 2013 11:40 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Looks like a fun evening. I have a bottle of that Haut-Medoc on deck in my current lineup; now I'm looking forward to it!
[User Picture Icon]
From:animimi
Date:April 15th, 2013 11:55 pm (UTC)
(Link)
It definitely sounds like a fun evening!

I've had that Haut-Medoc before and didn't like it. I bet I didn't let it breathe enough.
[User Picture Icon]
From:atomgal
Date:April 16th, 2013 08:52 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I recently had the Coppola Claret for the first time, and I thought it was very good.

(And thanks for the tip on the Haut-Medoc - I'll have to remember that if I try it.)
(Leave a comment)
Top of Page Powered by LiveJournal.com